Just a quick proposal, as the concern over terminology has come up with the recent changing of hands of the 405th, and that is the use of the term Division, as the 405th is, in itself, a Division, so to use that term implies an entity separate from (and in some minds in competition with) the 405th. There is talk of establishing a system of Regiments with much the same idea as is intended here: setting up a smaller group within the 405th comprised of members living within a localized geographical area. Exact requirements and the "application process" are still being hammered out, but in the meantime I would simply suggest that perhaps the word "Division" be amended in the title and OP so as not to cause any confusion.