RadioactiveMicrobe
Well-Known Member
That's what I pretty much figured after I posted that. I didn't really specify that much, and when I think back to when I actually read them, my conclusion wasn't too far off from yours, and was used to just throw off any lother listeners.Is that fact or opinion? You seem rather certain... :confused
While I think that's one of the better suggestions, decryption really doesn't work that way - it can't. Why only those specific letters? Assuming file degradation, one would expect to see random errors scattered throughout the transmissions. Mil-spec cryptography (even today) is significantly better than that. If encrypted transmissions were subject to random decryption errors each time they were encrypted/decrypted, they would be essentially useless. What if some of those errors/omissions happened to be numerals instead of letters - say dates, or times, or coordinates for an attack? That would throw any coordinated military actions into a complete shamble.
I'm sorry but I can't accept "VHS-like" degradation as the reason. VHS copies degrade because the physical medium degrades, not because of any issue with the decoding algorithms (and it's 30-year old tech - we have already advanced significantly). Not to mention the fact that it is a fair assumption that encryption at that level (and in the future) is done in the digital domain. Even today we can make bit-perfect digital copies of encrypted files (large and small) and reproduce them ad infinitum. I should hope that our technology hasn't deteriorated that far 500 years from now...
I believe that because of these “errors” specific repeatability (and the notable lack of random errors elsewhere), they are not errors at all, but the result of intentional design.
Last edited by a moderator: