Oh wow you edited a photo in paint! I'm so totally convinced now. There's nothing to dispute that, I mean it's solid proof of how I could be so totally wrong.[/sarcasm]The Kraken said:Talking about whale skin patterns and trying to prove a point other than yours is correct is illogical? Okay...
Let's say we make a bite mark on the previous picture I posted...
![]()
Interesting. Similar?
Fine it's a whale, whatever you win, if you're only going to look at that one picture, but how about all of them in sequence?
And what's unreasonable, is your argument without admitting even just a little bit that you could be wrong and insinuating that I'm completely wrong.
Thinking your right and arguing your point is one thing, but being ignorant to others is totally disrespectful.
Except in one statement about the carcases not being whales(which I admitted now that they may or may not be), but with all the other evidence I don't see that they would be, I have never said my theory was fact.
My series of events went like this:
-Oil rig's drilling wakes up mom beast
-It attacks oil rig and tanker on surface
-Military blows the crap out of the beast
-Fishes the pieces out of the water and brings them to shore
-The baby(creature in the movie) comes to land looking for mommy, hence the 'attack'.
Make sense? No? Then what's your idea? (<----All I really wanted to hear in the first place, not why my theory was so flawed it wasn't possible in the slightest)
Last edited by a moderator: