256 players? I wouldn't want to play...
1.) As stated above....NETWORK LAG
2.) If all they have to say about it is "It can support 256 Players!" then the rest of the game might be lacking
3.) 1:100 Ratio of actual players to n00bie 10 year olds. Seriously any game that brags about their Multiplayer brings swarms of little kids
4.) Load times of the HUGE ass map that is to support these 256 people must be an hour long
5.) Its only going to be on PS3, which is already lacking on a large community, where is our price cut Sony?
6.) Graphics are going to be low quality, because nothing can support 256 players and a colossal map under graphics like UT3 or Crysis without system lag (Though Graphics are not much if a factor IMO)
Nintendo didn't announce much, but what they did either was expected or known, regardless though their lineup looks pretty good, go WiiMusic!
Sony did the same, announcing everything we already heard about and are waiting for from E3 07 with the addition of a few things here and there that were just holding us over for the REAL titles like Killzone and Resistance. Also announcing the same partnerships that Microsoft took with MGM and the other studios.
Microsoft announced a new dashboard (Ugly but who cares?), Avatars (A rip-off sure, but didnt Sony do the same with their 'Trophy' system? Nintendo seems to be the only honest one lol), a long line-up games we knew about, and a complete shock with the exclusive FFXIII, along with the news that a new 360 is coming out, as well as a partnership with Netflix that will double the already numerous content on the video market, along with partnering with all the new channels and movie companies like Sci-Fi and MGM, IMO Microsoft won.