which costs more??

[BenStreeper]

unfortunatly that was a trick question, as they both cost the same.... :drunk:

 

[SPARTAN MJOLNIR]

:drink: :drunk: :celebrate: :drink: :drunk: :celebrate:

Nice. Very nice. But I believe those $200 could have been better spent...

 

[Chewdog316]

Me too.

 

[silvercookie]

could have been spent on guiness

 

[SPARTAN 053]

If you turn the Fosters into Bawls, ill tottaly be in on it

 

[silvercookie]

If you turn the Fosters into Bawls, ill tottaly be in on it

:agree: :drunk: :celebrate:

 

[WanderingRon1n]

bawls is good 6 cups of coffee MmMmM. . . .

 

[Chewdog316]

I still stand by the xbox and fosters being cheaper.

And more fun.

PS3 is pretty, but there is only a few fun games, granted its new but i dont know i was a playstation advicate since it was born, but i feel like the industry is slowly morphing into a pc.

Next they will offer a desktop PC with a switch to go from PC to video game system, maybe not a switch but an OS integrated gaming computer.

Maybe thats what it already is.

Argh im confused.

Im with the xbox now.
And the Wii.