Personally, I think that the Call of Duty series’ multiplayer is HORRABLE. No balance in the firearms (there weapons that are amazing in every way, shape and form, therefore everybody uses it, and that just makes the game, when online, the largest piss-off and waist of time ever).
However, campaign is a different story. This is because the terrible weapon balance actually compliments the single player attribute of the game, therefore posing an actual threat from the enemy AI (when on hardened or veteran difficulty). This makes the campaign somewhat of a challenge, apposed to an easy sweep-through.
For example, I find the campaign of all of the CoD games fun because I don’t resort to cheep tactics. I try not to use the M203 grenade launcher (or anything that launches high-explosives in general unless it is absolutely needed). I also don’t run and gun, spam grenades, and so-on… If you actually play the game tactically (Check your corners, flash/frag a room before you clear it, flank the enemy, and actually take cover apposed to sprinting 24/7) ,the campaign aspect of the game becomes extremely fun.
If you really want to enjoy the game, don’t sprint around with a flame thrower then let loose when you see an enemy. That destroys the fun of the game. Sure, it may be fun to burn ‘em out, but it becomes boring after a while.
As for the Modern Warfare 2 campaign, I thought it was excellent. I loved the story (the Russians invading the US was an excellent touch- No offence if that comment was at all offensive), and I hope that Black Ops is just as good campaign wise as Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2. I’ve lost all Multiplayer hope for CoD anyway… But, I won’t let that ruin the campaign.
Regardless, I’ll be renting the game today to see if it is worth buying later down the road.
That’s just my 2 cents.
Stay frosty, and see you on the battlefield,
Jake
Xtreme TACTICS 101